<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Beardo&#039;s Sweet Blog &#187; .Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.beardosnuts.com/tags/net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.beardosnuts.com</link>
	<description>Get your sweet nuts here...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Of names and naming conventions&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.beardosnuts.com/2009/01/16/of-names-and-naming-conventions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.beardosnuts.com/2009/01/16/of-names-and-naming-conventions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C#]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beardosnuts.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wish that developers would realize that some naming conventions are no longer necessary. At my present job, we have a developer who insists on putting an E before the name of an enumerated type. Like ColumnType becomes EColumnType. His claim is that it helps readability, and you know it&#8217;s an enumerated type without looking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish that developers would realize that some naming conventions are no longer necessary. At my present job, we have a developer who insists on putting an E before the name of an enumerated type. Like ColumnType becomes EColumnType. His claim is that it helps readability, and you know it&#8217;s an enumerated type without looking at the definition. I&#8217;ve tried to point out that the compiler will gladly point out when you&#8217;re using an enumerated type incorrectly, and won&#8217;t let you use it where it&#8217;s not appropriate (this is C# mind you). </p>
<p>Alas, he still does it. I know he does it because C allows you to use integers where an enumerated value can be and vice-versa, but still, it&#8217;s 2008, C# and other modern languages have changed to help prevent you from doing stupid things (unless you really mean to). Just let the compiler do it&#8217;s job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.beardosnuts.com/2009/01/16/of-names-and-naming-conventions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
